AI can be useful as a drafting partner, but a fluent sentence is not evidence that the underlying statement is accurate. A thoughtful workflow makes review visible.
Give the draft useful boundaries
Describe the intended audience, the situation, the available evidence, and the claims that must not be made. Include the tone you want and the details that need confirmation. Avoid putting sensitive information into a system without understanding how it will be handled.
Review meaning before style
Check what the draft actually promises. Remove unsupported statistics, invented endorsements, and capabilities the product does not provide. Then ask whether the wording sounds natural for the people you want to reach.
A useful review record can be simple: what changed, who reviewed it, and which questions remain open. That gives the next person context.
Make the decision yours
Use generated options to widen your choices. Choose the direction based on your knowledge of the product and the people it serves. Keep a clear distinction between suggested language and approved public copy.
The goal is a workflow in which technology contributes ideas while people remain responsible for what gets published.
